DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Rover 600 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 600
AudiMakeRover
80Model600
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 600
14,1 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
174 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
182 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 600
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 600
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 600
4482 mmLength4645 mm
1695 mmWidth1715 mm
1406 mmHeight1380 mm
1270 KgWeight1255 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Rover 600 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…