DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

54.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
80ModelCapella
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
182 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size165/80 R13

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4515 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1406 mmHeight1395 mm
1270 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…