DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Jaguar XF vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XFModelRanger
2014Model year2015
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
163 HPPower160 HP
400 NmTorque385 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength5362 mm
1939 mmWidth1860 mm
1468 mmHeight1815 mm
1735 KgWeight1883 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Jaguar XF and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…