DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jaguar XF vs 2015 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMitsubishi
XFModelASX
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
229 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,0 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4954 mmLength4295 mm
1987 mmWidth1770 mm
1457 mmHeight1625 mm
1545 KgWeight1460 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jaguar XF and 2015 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…