DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Acura TL vs 1994 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeNissan
TLModelCedric
1995Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
176 HPPower160 HP
0 NmTorque248 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/65 R15

Dimensions

4864 mmLength4800 mm
1786 mmWidth1745 mm
1405 mmHeight1410 mm
—Weight1560 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Acura TL and 1994 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…