DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi 80 vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
AudiMakeMazda
80Model323
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
18,3 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
160 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1489 cc
75 HPPower88 HP
140 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
4482 mmLength4245 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1408 mmHeight1355 mm
1355 KgWeight1115 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi 80 and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…