DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi 80 vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
AudiMakeFord
80ModelEscort
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
18,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
160 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70/13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1408 mmHeight—
1355 KgWeight1200 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi 80 and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…