DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XE vs 2017 Alfa Romeo 4C Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 4C

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

89.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
XEModel4C
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed258 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
365 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—TransmissionTCT
—Tyre size18
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4672 mmLength3989 mm
—Width1864 mm
1425 mmHeight1183 mm
1540 KgWeight895 kg
—Luggage capacity110 lt
2835 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XE and 2017 Alfa Romeo 4C approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 4C leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…