2017 • Jaguar
XE
Jaguar XE 2.0 (240 Hp) 2017Overall Score84.5/100
2017 Jaguar XE vs 2019 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2019 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.5 SKYACTIV-G (250 Hp) 2019Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Jaguar XE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar XESpecificationMazda CX-5
JaguarMakeMazda
XEModelCX-5
2017Model year2019
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Jaguar XESpecificationMazda CX-5
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
340 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar XESpecificationMazda CX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jaguar XESpecificationMazda CX-5
4672 mmLength4549 mm
1850 mmWidth1841 mm
1416 mmHeight1679 mm
1530 KgWeight1735 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2697 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Jaguar XE and 2019 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableJaguar F-Pace vs Jaguar XE2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableJaguar XF vs Jaguar XE2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Discovery vs Jaguar XE2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Range Rover Velar vs Jaguar XE2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Range Rover Sport vs Jaguar XE2017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…