DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jaguar X-type vs 2006 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelC70
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
225 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
196 HPPower220 HP
241 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4582 mm
1789 mmWidth1820 mm
1430 mmHeight1400 mm
1570 KgWeight1651 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jaguar X-type and 2006 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…