DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Jaguar X-type vs 2002 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelS60
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2099 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
156 HPPower163 HP
196 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4576 mm
1789 mmWidth1804 mm
1430 mmHeight1428 mm
1450 KgWeight1570 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Jaguar X-type and 2002 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…