DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar X-type vs 2009 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMazda
X-typeModel3
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
207 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2099 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
156 HPPower150 HP
196 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4716 mmLength4580 mm
1789 mmWidth1755 mm
1483 mmHeight1470 mm
1515 KgWeight1390 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar X-type and 2009 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…