1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.9 TD (75 Hp) 1992Overall Score47.25/100
1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.5 (C52A) 1992Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Audi 80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
AudiMakeMitsubishi
80ModelColt
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
17,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
162 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1468 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4482 mmLength3950 mm
1695 mmWidth1670 mm
1406 mmHeight1380 mm
1270 KgWeight890 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…