DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
AudiMakeFord
80ModelEscort
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
17,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
162 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1555 cc
75 HPPower76 HP
140 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
4482 mmLength4036 mm
1695 mmWidth1692 mm
1406 mmHeight1369 mm
1270 KgWeight1065 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…