E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 80 vs 1984 Saab 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 90
AudiMakeSaab
80Model90
1982Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 90
10,3 s0–100 km/h—
181 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1921 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
154 NmTorque161 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R13Tyre size155/80 R15

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 90
4383 mmLength4344 mm
1682 mmWidth1675 mm
1365 mmHeight1429 mm
1000 KgWeight955 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 80 and 1984 Saab 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Ford SierraVS1982 Audi 80Ford Sierra vs Audi 801982 and 1982 model years1984 Opel KadettVS1982 Audi 80Opel Kadett vs Audi 801984 and 1982 model years1984 Saab 90VS1982 Audi 80Saab 90 vs Audi 801984 and 1982 model years1983 Nissan MaximaVS1982 Audi 80Nissan Maxima vs Audi 801983 and 1982 model yearsImage unavailableVS1982 Audi 80Toyota Mark II vs Audi 801984 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…