DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jaguar F-type vs 2015 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
F-typeModelV60
2015Model year2015
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
260 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
340 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/45 R18; 275/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4635 mm
1923 mmWidth1899 mm
1308 mmHeight1484 mm
1587 KgWeight—
2622 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jaguar F-type and 2015 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…