DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-type vs 2016 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
F-typeModelV60
2017Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h4,8 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
300 HPPower367 HP
400 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears8 Geartronic
—Tyre size245/35 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4635 mm
1923 mmWidth1899 mm
1307 mmHeight1484 mm
1545 KgWeight1796 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-type and 2016 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…