DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-type vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
F-typeModelS90
2017Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h4,7 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
300 HPPower320 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption1,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
8Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4963 mm
1923 mmWidth1879 mm
1307 mmHeight1443 mm
1545 KgWeight—
2622 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-type and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…