DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-PaceModelB3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h4,0 s
250 km/hTop speed301 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
380 HPPower440 HP
450 NmTorque660 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4632 mm
—Width1811 mm
1652 mmHeight1431 mm
1861 KgWeight1705 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…