2016 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 (380 Hp) 2016Overall Score92.5/100
2016 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2015 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 3.0 T6 (350 Hp) 2015Overall Score93.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationVolvo S60
JaguarMakeVolvo
F-PaceModelS60
2016Model year2015
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationVolvo S60
5,5 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
380 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationVolvo S60
4731 mmLength4635 mm
—Width1899 mm
1652 mmHeight1484 mm
1861 KgWeight—
2874 mmWheelbase2776 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Jaguar F-Pace and 2015 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…