2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 (340 Hp) 2017Overall Score92.5/100
2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Alpina XD3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Alpina
XD3
Alpina XD3 3.0 (350 Hp) 2017Overall Score93.5/100
WINNER
Alpina XD3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAlpina XD3
JaguarMakeAlpina
F-PaceModelXD3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAlpina XD3
5,8 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed251 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
340 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAlpina XD3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAlpina XD3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size255/40 ZR20; 285/35 ZR20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAlpina XD3
4731 mmLength4651 mm
—Width1901 mm
1652 mmHeight1670 mm
1820 KgWeight1910 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2810 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Alpina XD3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina XD3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…