DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2015 Alpina D3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-PaceModelD3
2016Model year2015
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

5,8 s0–100 km/h4,6 s
250 km/hTop speed278 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
340 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch Tronic
—Tyre sizeFront tyres: 245/35 ZR19 90Y XL, Rear tyres: 265/35 ZR19 94Y XL
YesABS—

Dimensions

4731 mmLength—
1652 mmHeight—
1820 KgWeight—
2874 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jaguar F-Pace and 2015 Alpina D3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…