DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2018 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAudi
F-PaceModelTT
2017Model year2018
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
209 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower197 HP
430 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 S tronic
—Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4191 mm
—Width1832 mm
1652 mmHeight1353 mm
1665 KgWeight1345 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2018 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…