DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2014 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
F-PaceModelXF
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
209 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
180 HPPower200 HP
430 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4961 mm
—Width1939 mm
1652 mmHeight1468 mm
1665 KgWeight1735 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jaguar F-Pace and 2014 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…