DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Audi 80 vs 1988 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeNissan
80ModelBluebird
1988Model year1988
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1809 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
140 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

4393 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1397 mmHeight1375 mm
1020 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Audi 80 and 1988 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…