DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Jaguar E-Pace vs 2018 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMazda
E-PaceModel3
2018Model year2018
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
199 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2191 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17; 235/65 R17; 235/60 R18; 235/55 R19; 245/45 R20; 245/45 R21Tyre size205/60 R16; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4470 mm
1984 mmWidth1795 mm
1649 mmHeight1465 mm
1775 KgWeight1320-1406 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Jaguar E-Pace and 2018 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…