DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Isuzu Trooper vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeNissan
TrooperModelCedric
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
160 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
159 HPPower160 HP
333 NmTorque248 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4795 mmLength4690 mm
1835 mmWidth1690 mm
1840 mmHeight1425 mm
2145 KgWeight1520 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Isuzu Trooper and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…