DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 80 vs 1978 Saab 99 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 99

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 99
AudiMakeSaab
80Model99
1982Model year1978
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 99
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
112 HPPower118 HP
157 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 99
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 99
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R13Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 99
4383 mmLength4420 mm
1682 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1435 mm
960 KgWeight1161 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2477 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 80 and 1978 Saab 99 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 99 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…