DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 80 vs 1986 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
80ModelSierra
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
10,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
4406 mmLength4425 mm
1682 mmWidth1694 mm
1350 mmHeight1407 mm
1120 KgWeight—
2525 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 80 and 1986 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…