DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Isuzu Rodeo vs 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeOldsmobile
RodeoModelCutlass
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
177 HPPower141 HP
260 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/75 R15 PTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4921 mm
1690 mmWidth1804 mm
1660 mmHeight1391 mm
1791 KgWeight1450 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Isuzu Rodeo and 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…