DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Isuzu Rodeo vs 1993 Ford Aerostar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeFord
RodeoModelAerostar
1993Model year1993
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
177 HPPower147 HP
260 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R15 PTyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4440 mm
1690 mmWidth1820 mm
1660 mmHeight1850 mm
1791 KgWeight1530 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Isuzu Rodeo and 1993 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…