DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Isuzu MU-X vs 2015 Honda Elysion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Elysion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeHonda
MU-XModelElysion
2017Model year2015
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
245/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4920 mm
1860 mmWidth1845 mm
1825-1830 mmHeight1810 mm
1985-2025 KgWeight2020 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Isuzu MU-X and 2015 Honda Elysion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Elysion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…