DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Isuzu MU-X vs 2015 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu MU-X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeJeep
MU-XModelWrangler
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2776 cc
177 HPPower197 HP
380 NmTorque460 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size245/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4223 mm
1860 mmWidth1873 mm
1825-1830 mmHeight1840 mm
1985-2025 KgWeight1858 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Isuzu MU-X and 2015 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu MU-X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…