DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Isuzu MU-X vs 2015 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu MU-X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeChrysler
MU-XModelVoyager
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement3301 cc
177 HPPower174 HP
380 NmTorque278 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4808 mm
1860 mmWidth1997 mm
1825-1830 mmHeight1803 mm
1985-2025 KgWeight—
2845 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Isuzu MU-X and 2015 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu MU-X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…