1995 • Isuzu
Mu
Isuzu Mu 2.8 DT (110 HP) 1995Overall Score61.5/100
1995 Isuzu Mu vs 1995 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 TD 4X4 (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Isuzu Mu
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu MuSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
IsuzuMakeMitsubishi
MuModelL 200
1995Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Isuzu MuSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
0 km/hTop speed152 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
110 HPPower90 HP
226 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Isuzu MuSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4135 mmLength4500 mm
1780 mmWidth1655 mm
1675 mmHeight1570 mm
—Weight1820 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Isuzu Mu and 1995 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSAudi A6 vs Isuzu Mu1995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVSChrysler LE Baron vs Isuzu Mu1995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVSMercedes-Benz E Serisi vs Isuzu Mu1995 and 1995 model years
VSNissan Vanette vs Isuzu Mu1995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVSMitsubishi L 200 vs Isuzu Mu1995 and 1995 model yearsComments are loading…