1990 • Isuzu
Mu
Isuzu Mu 2.8 DT (110 HP) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
1990 Isuzu Mu vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1990Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu MuSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
IsuzuMakeOldsmobile
MuModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Isuzu MuSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
110 HPPower106 HP
226 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu MuSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
DieselFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu MuSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu MuSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4135 mmLength4555 mm
1780 mmWidth1700 mm
1675 mmHeight1330 mm
—Weight1185 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Isuzu Mu and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…