1990 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 E (112 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.25/100
1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8i 16V (115 Hp) 1990Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Celica
AudiMakeToyota
80ModelCelica
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Celica
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
112 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Celica
4393 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1397 mmHeight1300 mm
1050 KgWeight1200 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…