DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Storm
AudiMakeGeo
80ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Storm
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
112 HPPower130 HP
160 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank47 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Storm
4393 mmLength4150 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1300 mm
1050 KgWeight1010 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…