1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 CL (90 Hp) 1983Overall Score51.25/100
1983 Audi 80 vs 1982 SsangYong Korando Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • SsangYong
Korando
SsangYong Korando 2.2 D (68 Hp) 1982Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Korando
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationSsangYong Korando
AudiMakeSsangYong
80ModelKorando
1983Model year1982
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2/4Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationSsangYong Korando
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed125 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement2238 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
145 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationSsangYong Korando
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationSsangYong Korando
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
—Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationSsangYong Korando
4383 mmLength3860 mm
1682 mmWidth1700 mm
1365 mmHeight1850 mm
930 KgWeight1590 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2390 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 80 and 1982 SsangYong Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…