DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Isuzu D-Max vs 2008 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.

54.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeMitsubishi
D-MaxModelL 200
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

25,7 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
150 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
280 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/75 R15Tyre size205/80 R16

Dimensions

5035 mmLength5000 mm
1800 mmWidth1750 mm
1735 mmHeight1775 mm
—Weight1935 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Isuzu D-Max and 2008 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…