1990 • Isuzu
Bighorn
Isuzu Bighorn 2.2 D (87 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.5/100
1990 Isuzu Bighorn vs 1990 Mercury Tracer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Tracer
IsuzuMakeMercury
BighornModelTracer
1990Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Tracer
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2238 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
87 HPPower88 HP
183 NmTorque146 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Tracer
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Tracer
4470 mmLength4341 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1845 mmHeight1338 mm
1700 KgWeight1030 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Isuzu Bighorn and 1990 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…