DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Isuzu Ascender vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Ascender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeVolvo
AscenderModelXC90
2008Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
175 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4157 ccEngine displacement4414 cc
279 HPPower315 HP
373 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption19,8 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5273 mmLength4798 mm
1933 mmWidth1898 mm
1918 mmHeight1743 mm
2245 KgWeight2080 Kg
3277 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Isuzu Ascender and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Ascender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…