DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Audi 80 vs 1987 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
80Model626
1987Model year1987
SedanBody type—
5Seats4+1
4Doors—

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
12,3 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
150 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
4393 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1130 KgWeight1190 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Audi 80 and 1987 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…