DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Infiniti QX60 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

InfinitiMakeMazda
QX60ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
231 HPPower192 HP
330 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5095 mmLength4633 mm
1961 mmWidth1840 mm
1742 mmHeight1535 mm
2105 KgWeight1545 Kg
2901 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Infiniti QX60 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…