E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 80 vs 1985 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
AudiMakeRover
80Model200
1986Model year1985
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
14,6 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1300 cc
80 HPPower75 HP
155 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
4393 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1090 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 80 and 1985 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1986 Hyundai StellarVS1986 Audi 80Hyundai Stellar vs Audi 801986 and 1986 model yearsImage unavailableVS1986 Audi 80Daewoo LE Mans vs Audi 801986 and 1986 model years1986 Opel AsconaVS1986 Audi 80Opel Ascona vs Audi 801986 and 1986 model years1986 Mazda 323VS1986 Audi 80Mazda 323 vs Audi 801986 and 1986 model years1986 Kia CapitalVS1986 Audi 80Kia Capital vs Audi 801986 and 1986 model years

Comments are loading…