DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 80 vs 1986 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
AudiMakeMazda
80Model323
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
14,6 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
80 HPPower75 HP
155 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank43 lt
6 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size"155/80 R13 82S "

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 323
4393 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1090 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 80 and 1986 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…