1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 TD (70 Hp) 1983Overall Score51.25/100
1983 Audi 80 vs 1983 Volvo 340-360 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1983 • Volvo
340-360
Volvo 340-360 1.4 (71 Hp) 1983Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Volvo 340-360
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 340-360
AudiMakeVolvo
80Model340-360
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3/5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 340-360
13,9 s0–100 km/h—
158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1400 cc
70 HPPower71 HP
130 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 340-360
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 340-360
4383 mmLength—
1682 mmWidth—
1365 mmHeight—
1020 KgWeight950 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 80 and 1983 Volvo 340-360 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 340-360 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…