1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 E (101 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
AudiMakeMitsubishi
80ModelFTO
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
189 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1594 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower126 HP
130 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption17,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4482 mmLength4320 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1408 mmHeight1300 mm
—Weight1100 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…