1993 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 E (101 Hp) 1993Overall Score55.25/100
1993 Audi 80 vs 1993 Nissan Pulsar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar 1.6 i 16V X1 R (5 dr) 1993Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Pulsar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Pulsar
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelPulsar
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Pulsar
13,4 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
101 HPPower110 HP
130 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Pulsar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Pulsar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Pulsar
4482 mmLength4145 mm
1695 mmWidth1670 mm
1406 mmHeight1385 mm
1230 KgWeight1070 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Audi 80 and 1993 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Pulsar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…