1986 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 D (54 Hp) 1986Overall Score43.5/100
1986 Audi 80 vs 1990 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 1.3 (61 Hp) 1990Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Audi 80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
43.5–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationRover Mini MK
AudiMakeRover
80ModelMini MK
1986Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationRover Mini MK
19,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
144 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
54 HPPower61 HP
100 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationRover Mini MK
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size145/70 R12
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationRover Mini MK
4406 mmLength3050 mm
1682 mmWidth1410 mm
1365 mmHeight1350 mm
980 KgWeight695 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1986 Audi 80 and 1990 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…